3. Results and discussion
Extracts received from eight different genus edible fish grown
in salt and fresh water collected from local grocery stores in Maryville,
Missouri were analyzed by GC-SIM-MS technique. Reagent
blanks and injection sequence solvent blanks were also analyzed
and did not show the presence of any characteristics mass signals
of the target compounds listed in Table 2. Thus, it was recognized
that the HHCB, AHTN nitromusks, TCS antimicrobial agent, and
DPH antihistamine were originally received from the edible fish fillet
extracts.
3.1. Detection protocols of target analytes in fish
Detection of the select target compounds in the fish fillet
extract was accomplished by GC–MS in the SIM mode. Mass spectral
features and retention times, given by the target compounds
from the fish extracts, were employed to characterize the compounds,
by comparing with the authentic standards. Representative
SIM ion chromatograms shown in Fig. 2 are for (A) a
standard solution containing, 100 pg ll
1 of TCS and (B) a Whiting
(genus Merlangius) fillet extract. These chromatograms illustrate
an excellent similarity of the retention time of the TCS eluted from
the capillary column at 21.28 min with an increment of 0.01 min in
the Whiting fish fillet sample. An increment of retention time, up
to 0.08 min, was observed for other fish such as Salmon and Tuna
fillet extracts (not shown), and peak widths at half-height were
about 3 s. The variations of retention behavior were expected because
of interferences from the matrix which co-extracted with
the target compounds from fish specimens. These insignificant
variations of retention time allowed identification and quantifica
3. Results and discussionExtracts received from eight different genus edible fish grownin salt and fresh water collected from local grocery stores in Maryville,Missouri were analyzed by GC-SIM-MS technique. Reagentblanks and injection sequence solvent blanks were also analyzedand did not show the presence of any characteristics mass signalsof the target compounds listed in Table 2. Thus, it was recognizedthat the HHCB, AHTN nitromusks, TCS antimicrobial agent, andDPH antihistamine were originally received from the edible fish filletextracts.3.1. Detection protocols of target analytes in fishDetection of the select target compounds in the fish filletextract was accomplished by GC–MS in the SIM mode. Mass spectralfeatures and retention times, given by the target compoundsfrom the fish extracts, were employed to characterize the compounds,by comparing with the authentic standards. RepresentativeSIM ion chromatograms shown in Fig. 2 are for (A) astandard solution containing, 100 pg ll1 of TCS and (B) a Whiting(genus Merlangius) fillet extract. These chromatograms illustratean excellent similarity of the retention time of the TCS eluted fromthe capillary column at 21.28 min with an increment of 0.01 min inthe Whiting fish fillet sample. An increment of retention time, upto 0.08 min, was observed for other fish such as Salmon and Tunafillet extracts (not shown), and peak widths at half-height wereabout 3 s. The variations of retention behavior were expected becauseof interferences from the matrix which co-extracted withthe target compounds from fish specimens. These insignificantvariations of retention time allowed identification and quantifica
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..
