Fig. 3. Mean weight in 1991, 1995, and 1999 according to trends in sugar-sweetened
soft drink consumption in 1969 women who changed consumption between 1991 and
1995 and either changed or maintained level of consumption until 1999 (Low and high
intakes were defined as ≤1/week and ≥1/day. The number of subjects was: low–high–
high=323, low–high–low=461, high–low–high=110, and high–low–low=746.
Groups with similar intake in 1991 and 1995 were combined for estimates for these
time points. Means were adjusted for age, alcohol intake, physical activity, smoking,
postmenopausal hormone use, oral contraceptive use, cereal fiber intake, and total fat
intake at each time point. Modified from Ref. [50]).
Fig. 3. Mean weight in 1991, 1995, and 1999 according to trends in sugar-sweetenedsoft drink consumption in 1969 women who changed consumption between 1991 and1995 and either changed or maintained level of consumption until 1999 (Low and highintakes were defined as ≤1/week and ≥1/day. The number of subjects was: low–high–high=323, low–high–low=461, high–low–high=110, and high–low–low=746.Groups with similar intake in 1991 and 1995 were combined for estimates for thesetime points. Means were adjusted for age, alcohol intake, physical activity, smoking,postmenopausal hormone use, oral contraceptive use, cereal fiber intake, and total fatintake at each time point. Modified from Ref. [50]).
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..