Confirmatory factor analyses (CFA) in both samples showed higher model fit for the two-factor solution than for the one-factor solution. However, the difference in the URS was small, suggesting a one-factor solution due to parsimony (Figure 1). Factor loadings and model fit were consistently higher in the URS than in the RS. Based on a two-factor solution, the correlation between the factors resulted in high obliqueness in the URS (r = .85) and near-orthogonality in the RS (r = .13). No residual correlations were specified within the models.