Dear Sir,
We refer to your submission listed above requesting CSCBL to review the Material
Submission No. C2-EN-MAT-AR-015.
We have reviewed the said submission and have comments as list below;
• The Submission requires to be re-arranged in accordance with "Procedure and
Requirements of Material/ Equipment Approval for E&M and Architectural worlds" in
CSCBLs letter Ref. CSCBL/C2/CK/QA/01802, letter Ref. CSCBUC2/CK/QA/01393.
• The proposed product model does not appear to be suitable for the design of the Entrances
in Blue Line Extension project Subsequently, the mock up test during the factory visit is
considered invalid.
You are requested to review and revise your documents and resubmit
Please be advised that the proposed manufacturer is not rejected. But the submission required
further supporting documents and proposes a model that is compatible and appropriate to
conform to the technical specification and Contract Requirements.
Also, please be advised that the resubmission shall include infomiation (but not limit to) as below;
• The test report of 1) Leakage rate and 2) Impact test.
• Ensure that the attached design dravinngs are the current design of the Station Entrances
including the Installation details to prove that the product is suitable.
Your acknowledgment and further action would be highly appreciated.
Sincerely yours,
Chih Huang^
Project Manager
Enclosures: 1. Cover sheet of reference No. 1
cc; - Project Manager 2, MRTA
- Project Manager (Architecture), MRTA
- Project Manager, PMCBL
MRT K u e Lino ExtDnston Project
Ccmbact 2: Uftderground Qvil Works
Sanam Chai -Th» Phra Stclion
Date
Info AC Info
PM DPM •y
QA SF
CM EV
EN CA
KH SV
E&M CO
ft PR
CI CZ /
- TN