The fourth is that compared to laser and plasma cutting, water jet cutting material is a method by which there are no thermal deformation of the cut material.
The fifth is that the structure of the cut surface's hydro-abrasive technique is of a very high quality in that the edges are rounded and the burr is virtually non-existent.
The last comment is that the abrasive water jet is not the quickest way to cut, and a long time spent cutting increases the cost of cutting. From these findings it is clear that the water jet technique is the most suitable of those compared for cutting metals. This statement is consistent with the authors and their literature which is cited ithin and has been used as research for this article. In the next article I would like to attempt to expand my studies of technique comparison to include other materials such as marble, stone and ceramics.