For example, Park et al. (2002) view the construct of brand relationship quality as formative instead of substantive, so the relationship components in the original BRQ framework do not have to correlate to constitute a second-order construct. On the other hand, Chang and Chieng (2006) develop a revised framework of consumer-brand relationships by taking the experiential perspective, revealing that individual as well as shared experiences work through brand association, brand personality, brand attitude, and brand image to shape a first-order of consumer-brand relationships. In order to further deal with the issues concerning the model structure of the original BRQ framework, Smit et al. (2007) conduct a large-scale survey and find that BRQ is anteceded by eight (passionate attachment, intimacy, self-connection, nostalgic connection, love, partner quality, personal commitment and trust) instead of six relationship components as Fournier (1998) proposes. Moreover, the eight dimensions in tandem with brand personality typology (competent, sincere, exciting, sophisticated and rugged) exert influences as two first-order constructs of brand relationship quality. supportive, socio-affective, emotional and behavioral dimensions that the BRQ framework conceptualizes.