Our findings provided further evidence for a simple negative conclusion: there is
no comprehensive and coherent ‘attitude order.’ This is not a message of despair.
The phrase ‘‘Individual I likesrdislikes to extent X the description D of object O,
considered in context C’’ is, at least in principle, subject to measurement, verification
and modeling. We already know, for example, that different measures of liking
will yield similar estimates of X, and that if two objects spontaneously evoke the
same context C, measurements of their relative preference by liking and by choice
will probably be consistent. Attitudes do not lack structure, but their structure is
vastly more complex than the structure that economic analysis attributes to human
preferences.
Our findings provided further evidence for a simple negative conclusion: there isno comprehensive and coherent ‘attitude order.’ This is not a message of despair.The phrase ‘‘Individual I likesrdislikes to extent X the description D of object O,considered in context C’’ is, at least in principle, subject to measurement, verificationand modeling. We already know, for example, that different measures of likingwill yield similar estimates of X, and that if two objects spontaneously evoke thesame context C, measurements of their relative preference by liking and by choicewill probably be consistent. Attitudes do not lack structure, but their structure isvastly more complex than the structure that economic analysis attributes to humanpreferences.
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/98aba/98abadb1435b0cfbe63f2dabdddc22693678da81" alt=""