2. Method
2.1. Participants
Participants were 315 students from an urban public school
system who were identified by school officials (counselor or
student assistant staff) as a possibly using drugs and who met
study eligibility criteria. Most (n = 283)met a Diagnostic and
Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition
(DSM-IV; American Psychiatric Association, 1994) diagnostic
criteria for an alcohol use disorder, cannabis use disorder, or
both (see Table 1 for details).All of the 32 students who did not
meet criteria for any substance use disorder reported either one
or two dependence criteria for at least one substance (often
referred to as diagnostic orphans; Chung, Martin, Armstrong,
& Labouvie, 2002). Fifty-two percent were male, 68% were
White, 9.6% had received prior drug treatmentwas 16.3. Statistical tests on background characteristics,
including all measures of drug use involvement and
consequences, revealed no significant between-group differences
(see Table 1).
2. Method
2.1. Participants
Participants were 315 students from an urban public school
system who were identified by school officials (counselor or
student assistant staff) as a possibly using drugs and who met
study eligibility criteria. Most (n = 283)met a Diagnostic and
Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition
(DSM-IV; American Psychiatric Association, 1994) diagnostic
criteria for an alcohol use disorder, cannabis use disorder, or
both (see Table 1 for details).All of the 32 students who did not
meet criteria for any substance use disorder reported either one
or two dependence criteria for at least one substance (often
referred to as diagnostic orphans; Chung, Martin, Armstrong,
& Labouvie, 2002). Fifty-two percent were male, 68% were
White, 9.6% had received prior drug treatmentwas 16.3. Statistical tests on background characteristics,
including all measures of drug use involvement and
consequences, revealed no significant between-group differences
(see Table 1).
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..