1. Delayed distribution of written document of terms
1) The Plaintiff’s Claim and Details of the Decision
According to the plaintiff, although there was delivery of written documents describing
subcontract payments and other terms to subcontractors before starting the mold production,
continuous revision work was necessary for the mold in this case7
until its fit with the main
case could be ensured8
. Therefore, it was difficult to fix an accurate price at the ordering
stage. In addition, the plaintiff maintained that mold manufacturing was just a supplementary
process, responsible for only 1% of sales. As a result, from a subcontractor’s perspective,
fixing the mold price would not be of great concern as the final mold price would be set
within a range initially expected. Thus, even if there was no written document of terms
distributed at the time of mold completion, there were no damages on the part of the
subcontractor.
1. Delayed distribution of written document of terms 1) The Plaintiff’s Claim and Details of the Decision According to the plaintiff, although there was delivery of written documents describingsubcontract payments and other terms to subcontractors before starting the mold production,continuous revision work was necessary for the mold in this case7 until its fit with the maincase could be ensured8. Therefore, it was difficult to fix an accurate price at the orderingstage. In addition, the plaintiff maintained that mold manufacturing was just a supplementaryprocess, responsible for only 1% of sales. As a result, from a subcontractor’s perspective,fixing the mold price would not be of great concern as the final mold price would be setwithin a range initially expected. Thus, even if there was no written document of termsdistributed at the time of mold completion, there were no damages on the part of thesubcontractor.
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..