for help with the 787 project. The country's Ministry of Economy, Trade, and Industry has submitted a budget request that would make the 787 a "national project. Newspaper reports put the request at about $1.6 billion.
Upon hearing this, Airbus officials were quick to claim that the arrangement could violate several international agreements, including a 1994 WTO prohibition against subsidies that can harm competitors. Behind the scenes, Airbus executives started to urge the European Union to look at the issue and possibly file a case on their behalf. They also noted that Boeing received aid from the states of Washington and Kansas, where its factories are located, and action that constituted an unfair subsidy that was outside the scope of the 1992 agreement.
In mid-2004, the issue became even more contentious when the u.s. government demanded an end to airbus's launch aid. airbus had already been granted loans of 3.7 billion to develop its latest aircraft, the A380 super-jumbo, but what really got attention in america were signs from airbus that it would also build a direct competitor to the 787, the A350, and ask for launch aid to help cover the development costs of that plane. Estimates suggested the lunch aid for the A350 could total $1.75 billion. furthermore, in 2004 airbus surpassed boeing in global market share. American officials felt that given the strength of the company, subsidies were no longer appropriate. In late 2004, the EU and U.S. government entered into negotiations to try to resolve the dispute, but talks ended with no agreement, and in July 2005 the dispute went to the World Trade Organization, which must rule on the legality of the various subsidies. A ruling is not expected until 2007 .
Meanwhile, Boeing is starting to pile up orders for the 787, which by May 2006 totaled 349 aircraft.
สำหรับความช่วยเหลือโครงการ 787 ดรีม ของกระทรวงเศรษฐกิจ การค้า และประเทศอุตสาหกรรมได้ส่งคำของบประมาณที่จะทำให้ 787 ดรีม "โครงการแห่งชาติ รายงานหนังสือพิมพ์ใส่คำที่ประมาณ 1.6 พันล้านเหรียญ เมื่อได้ยิน เจ้าหน้าที่แอร์บัสได้อ้างว่า การจัดเรียงสามารถละเมิดหลายข้อตกลงระหว่างประเทศ รวมทั้งการ prohibition องค์การปี 1994 กับเงินอุดหนุนที่อาจเป็นอันตรายต่อคู่แข่งอย่างรวดเร็ว เบื้องหลัง ผู้บริหารแอร์บัสเริ่มต้นเพื่อกระตุ้นให้สหภาพยุโรปดูปัญหา และอาจรวมถึงแฟ้มกรณีในนามของตน พวกเขายังตั้งข้อสังเกตที่ช่วยโบที่ได้รับจากรัฐวอชิงตันและแคนซัส ที่โรงงานตั้งอยู่ และที่ทะลักเงินสมทบไม่เป็นธรรมที่มีอยู่ในขอบเขตของข้อตกลง 1992 In mid-2004, the issue became even more contentious when the u.s. government demanded an end to airbus's launch aid. airbus had already been granted loans of 3.7 billion to develop its latest aircraft, the A380 super-jumbo, but what really got attention in america were signs from airbus that it would also build a direct competitor to the 787, the A350, and ask for launch aid to help cover the development costs of that plane. Estimates suggested the lunch aid for the A350 could total $1.75 billion. furthermore, in 2004 airbus surpassed boeing in global market share. American officials felt that given the strength of the company, subsidies were no longer appropriate. In late 2004, the EU and U.S. government entered into negotiations to try to resolve the dispute, but talks ended with no agreement, and in July 2005 the dispute went to the World Trade Organization, which must rule on the legality of the various subsidies. A ruling is not expected until 2007 . Meanwhile, Boeing is starting to pile up orders for the 787, which by May 2006 totaled 349 aircraft.
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..