The purpose here is to begin to view the differences and problems within Russian psychology, to then reestablish their unity. It is claimed that there is one school of thought within the theories of Vygotsky, Leontiev, and Luria, with many varying trajectories and branches that ultimately complement each other. To avoid any risk of misunderstanding: there is no attempt to place all of these theories into one larger, all encompassing theory. In other words, at a meta‐theoretical level, there is a unity of thought; however, at other levels, these theories remain connected but also separate. The goal of this paper is very different than debating for or against a direct bridge of traditional Russian cultural‐historical and activity theory.