LIMITATIONS
One of the strengths of this study is the large number of countries examined. The
results are confounded by the varying sample sizes of responses from the different
countries. Australia and Moldova had particularly small sample sizes. However, similar
results were obtained when these countries were omitted from the study. Since this
study is exploratory, the responses from these two countries were included. The generalizability
of the results is limited because it is based on the administration of one ethical
case. These results should be viewed as preliminary until they can be replicated
using other cases.