Ø As the policy of SATL would like to still continue make cost down
is the benefit for SATL is important.
Ø Some dept. suggest that share the benefit for moral obligation,
However the others dept. argues that will be small benefit we get from this time.
Ø Both position are reasonable so before making final discussion, careful this provide here
Ø On one hand sharing the benefit first for make good relation
with client to keep client (Don’t change their mind to hire the others OEM) ,in case of safety standard with sustain quality
if we change from high to low quality but that is not good in the product.
Ø On the other hand don’t allow sharing first for get a bit benefit in profit up but not reach 1% (exactly just 0.6% from this part)
Or reduce the cost 8.9 baht, next for the others model (SATL) already have all changed, increasing a bit cost up in A4REG33PXS
A4REG33PXW A4RERD33PX A4REG23PXS A4REG23PXW if still not change it . So just inform that changing this part it is enough without sharing small benefit with small volume , beside as we have investigated in quality there is subsists quality as confirmed with authority
More important TTC already get enough profit more than SATL
Ø In the final analysis the a bit benefit will be not allow shared to TOSHIBA
In our team’s opinion however much benefit is should keep first and consider the volume.