Conclusions from this study are tempered by the limited experimental control demonstrated for paraprofessionals’ presentation rates because not all paraprofessionals had low presentation rates during baseline and Ms. Allen’s baseline rates increased over time. Although all paraprofessionals improved their skills in providing reading support for these students, only Ms. Tate maintained all skills after fluency training was completed, avoiding the need for performance feedback. Ms. Tate presented items correctly at a high rate during baseline (typically above the classroom criterion), which may have helped her acquire the other skills more quickly and maintain them after fluency training ended. Also, she was the only paraprofessional to end the study with all skills above the classroom criterion on 3 consecutive days. Future research with larger groups may determine whether mastery of certain prerequisite skills prior to the study enables some paraprofessionals to benefit differentially from this type of training. If so, researchers could improve this training to better meet the needs of individuals with lower prerequisite skills. Also, resources might be allotted to provide group training to all, with the awareness that some may need more individualized follow-up training.