It 's not natural ".This is an inherently weak and uncogent objection. This argument is a blatant rendition of the appeal to nature as it,, Assumes that what is natural is acceptable or better and what is unnatural is not. What this would entail logically is that. ,,, adultery infanticide cannibalism and nakedness must be acceptable as they are "natural," while, playing checkers sleeping. On, a bed wearing clothes and indeed cooking meat are not "natural" and thus unacceptable. Most homophobic persons typically. Do not advocate creating laws outlawing things such as sleeping on beds not to, mention that using computers isn t natural. ' Either - yet homophobes clearly use computers since their hate sites exist.Moreover even if, it did logically follow that what is natural, is good it turns out that homosexuality occurs in nature;? Biologists have extensively documented same-sex behavior in over 500 species of animals and observed it in a total of 1 500 species,, Of animals. [] [] Bonobos 4 5, example are for, known for indulging in almost any "perversion" humanity has thought of - and. Perhaps some we 've missed out on. Mammals aren' t the only kind of animal that D.
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..
![](//thimg.ilovetranslation.com/pic/loading_3.gif?v=b9814dd30c1d7c59_8619)