The comparison made in this paper shows that for
systems with cache size lower than code size, dynamic
use offers, in general, better performance –low
utilization- in front of static use. When cache size is close
to code size, still there is gain of performance using the
dynamic schema, but the probability to loss performance
rises as cache size is closer to code size. For systems with
cache size equal or greater than code size, static use
presents better performance than the dynamic schema,
this way, there is no advantage in using dynamically the
locking cache.