Some research has been done on the learning field level influence of transfer-boosting measures during a training measure. Several studies have concurrently shown that a high practical relevance of content, the biggest degree of similarity between the learning and application situations possible, and a learning environment with features of situated learning, as well as the specification of learning targets, have a positive influence on transfer of training. Often it has not yet been clarified in detail, what specific dimensions of these complex constructs cause this positive influence, so further research is needed. In regard to the methodical-didactic design of training measures, for example, the influences of method variation, transfer tasks, con-tent structuring and cognitive activation have not been examined. Little research has been done into the influence of specific transfer-boosting measures undertaken before or after a training measure. Again, further research to this end should bring greater clarity, for example regarding the influence of prior tasks, assignment clarification, critical incident surveys or follow-ups. What surprises about the presented analyses, is that, on the learning field level, there are currently no findings regarding the influence of personal characteristics and the expertise of the trainer. As table 1 shows, however, an influence of the didactic-methodological abilities is assumed by the central learning transfer models. A considerable deficit of research exists in this regard. Overall, it must be observed that further research should be more focused on a more detailed examination of training design as a determinant on transfer of training.