The other way these phenomena could be related
is if the detailed, specic formal mechanisms for handling
the two phenomena are similar. In fact, the
formal mechanisms proposed to handle them dier.
Hirschberg describes them as dierent phenomena before
dening her mechanism for scalar implicature, and
Gazdar states [Gazdar 79, p. 59] that his mechanism
for handling scalar implicatures does not generate
clausal implicatures, justifying his development of
a separate formal mechanism for clausal implicatures.
At the very least, no rigorous connection to the maxim
is established, and it seems clear to me that there really
isn't one. So, while each phenomenon appears to
be well-dened in its own right, there does not seem
to be any clear similarity in the way they are actually
processed.
The other way these phenomena could be related
is if the detailed, specic formal mechanisms for handling
the two phenomena are similar. In fact, the
formal mechanisms proposed to handle them dier.
Hirschberg describes them as dierent phenomena before
dening her mechanism for scalar implicature, and
Gazdar states [Gazdar 79, p. 59] that his mechanism
for handling scalar implicatures does not generate
clausal implicatures, justifying his development of
a separate formal mechanism for clausal implicatures.
At the very least, no rigorous connection to the maxim
is established, and it seems clear to me that there really
isn't one. So, while each phenomenon appears to
be well-dened in its own right, there does not seem
to be any clear similarity in the way they are actually
processed.
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..
