The construction of a glove sizing system illustrated in the present study indicates that a glove sizing system for males should certainly differ from that for females and include more sizes than that for females. By applying HL and HC as key dimensions, 1.3 cm of sizing interval length, and 2% of minimum population coverage rate to the 1988 US Army anthropometric data, the glove sizing system for males including 8 sizes (accommodation rateผ 90.2%) and that for females including 6 sizes (accommodation rate 97.6%) were constructed. The smaller number of sizes but the higher accommodation rate of the female glove sizing system was due to the smaller dispersions of HL and HC of the female population. Moreover, the glove sizing systems for males and females were found significantly different, overlapping only in one size.