Meyer and Allen (1991; Allen & Meyer, 1990) initially developed
their three-component model to address observed similarities
and differences in existing unidimensional conceptualizations of
organizational commitment (e.g., H. S. Becker, 1960; Mowday et
al., 1982; Wiener, 1982). Common to all, they argued, was the
belief that commitment binds an individual to an organization and
thereby reduces the likelihood of turnover. The main differences
were in the mindsets presumed to characterize the commitment.
These mindsets reflected three distinguishable themes: affective
attachment to the organization, obligation to remain, and perceived
cost of leaving. To distinguish among commitments characterized
by these different mindsets, Meyer and Allen labeled them “affective
commitment,” “normative commitment,” and “continuance
commitment,” respectively.
Meyer and Allen (1991; Allen & Meyer, 1990) initially developedtheir three-component model to address observed similaritiesand differences in existing unidimensional conceptualizations oforganizational commitment (e.g., H. S. Becker, 1960; Mowday etal., 1982; Wiener, 1982). Common to all, they argued, was thebelief that commitment binds an individual to an organization andthereby reduces the likelihood of turnover. The main differenceswere in the mindsets presumed to characterize the commitment.These mindsets reflected three distinguishable themes: affectiveattachment to the organization, obligation to remain, and perceivedcost of leaving. To distinguish among commitments characterizedby these different mindsets, Meyer and Allen labeled them “affectivecommitment,” “normative commitment,” and “continuancecommitment,” respectively.
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..