Fink (2007) writes about designing significant learning experiences in college courses using a process called integrated course design (ICD). His model includes the familiar triad of learning goals, teaching and learning activities and feedback/assessment. Learning goals identify what we want students to learn, learning activities identify how students will learn what it is we want them to learn, and the feedback/assessment identifies how we will know students have achieved the intended goals. Fink emphasizes, however, that these components are all influenced by “situational factors,” such as course context, professional expectations, and the nature of the subject, the students, and the teacher. He presents a taxonomy of significant learning that outlines six kinds of learning to consider when designing a course. The taxonomy, unlike Blooms’s well-known cognitive taxonomy, is interactive rather than hierarchical. The identified kinds of learning include foundational knowledge, application, integration, human dimension, caring, and learning how to learn. Fink’s book (2003) explores each aspect of the taxonomy and includes feedback from professors who have used this approach to curriculum design and have found it helpful.
Fink (2007) writes about designing significant learning experiences in college courses using a process called integrated course design (ICD). His model includes the familiar triad of learning goals, teaching and learning activities and feedback/assessment. Learning goals identify what we want students to learn, learning activities identify how students will learn what it is we want them to learn, and the feedback/assessment identifies how we will know students have achieved the intended goals. Fink emphasizes, however, that these components are all influenced by “situational factors,” such as course context, professional expectations, and the nature of the subject, the students, and the teacher. He presents a taxonomy of significant learning that outlines six kinds of learning to consider when designing a course. The taxonomy, unlike Blooms’s well-known cognitive taxonomy, is interactive rather than hierarchical. The identified kinds of learning include foundational knowledge, application, integration, human dimension, caring, and learning how to learn. Fink’s book (2003) explores each aspect of the taxonomy and includes feedback from professors who have used this approach to curriculum design and have found it helpful.
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..
