comparatives are apt to have any number of ways of construing diversity. For some, the heterogeneity
of religious worlds suggests types of evolving consciousness.
For others it represents ways that divinity reveals
itself,or patterning s of the human psyche, or simply cultural variations.For some,the many worlds hover over
the void;for others they are the very stuff of the gods. Paradoxically, in even mentioning such systems of
interpretation we begin to make a kind of U-turn,finding ourselves back in the subject matter of worldviews
in this case the worlds of modern interpretation as and object of study and respect.