A final implication that stems from the study is the possibility of
using the assessment methodology as a means of ranking or
weighting the indicators (sub-components) and the eight main
components in ways that can be used in designing future programs
and policy. The LVI provides a combination of objective (i.e. statistical
indicators) and subjective (through stakeholder inputs) indicators
that can be used to frame and evaluate policies aimed at
building livelihoods and resilience to climate change. That said,
managerial and institutional capacity cannot be taken for granted,
highlighting the need to support the ability of government and civil
society actors to invest in adjustment (coping), resistance and
recovery (resilience)