Legal History
Medieval law is the Ayutthaya period. What I don't like is that the legal system has sakdina.
The law against sakdina
From historical evidence, such as a stone inscription archives of Sukhothai and China, we know that there cannot be when modern sakdina trailokanat, but has a long history and is the only basis he has placed and adjusted. In the past treated God the land he owns land throughout the Kingdom. Government officials and the Royal family have no salary funds this year to date, much less give way by land, but the reality is, I don't have any land in the possession of the however, is defined as the class of the sakdina people and also be reflected in the other.
1.1 adjusting? The person who made a mistake. If it is higher than the fines sakdina than with lower or sakdina?, in the same case. If the King is wrong per the King's subjects will be fine by sakdina. If the subjects nobility, confessing the nobility and commoners sakdina removal if the wrong subjects, by the nobility against the nobility's sakdina.
1.2 setting Attorney. Those who are up to 400 acres to sakdina appoints the lawyer that represented themselves.
1.3 assign seats for watching When his Majesty went out that public land. Those who have a need to access 800 sakdina 10000. In addition, it is not mandatory. Position the seat height or distance, as near the sakdina. Enough to conclude that sakdina means The Decree defines the criteria to determine whether they are proprietary in farmland. Regulation of civil servant positions rank sakdina.
1. rank: Chao Phraya-Phra Khun Luang, ten thousand thousand.
2.2nd floor finish, etc., thus including the ruler of decho.
3. position: Chief of defence, Chief of the Prime Secretary of State etc.
4. the criteria determining the sakdina: follow each person ranks.
So I don't agree with the system, the system is power because sakdina sakdina possession. The land, which is a factor in making a living is by the elite fleece will benefit from the tax and rent the other, causing social inequality.