On the other hand, the comparison has demonstrated that supranational
regulations have a strong converging influence on nation states. This impact
has not been uniform, but it is visible, especially on the countries that did not
have counter-terrorism legislation in place. Supranational legislation has
thereby mainly led to what in policy convergence theory is called bconvergence
– it has mainly influenced the laggard countries to catch up with
the forerunner states. Thereby the similarity of the states has been growing.
However, as some states, most notably France and the UK, went further than
the supranational provisions required, whereas the other states complied
minimally with those provisions, convergence seems limited to a few areas of
counter-terrorism legislation.
On the other hand, the comparison has demonstrated that supranationalregulations have a strong converging influence on nation states. This impacthas not been uniform, but it is visible, especially on the countries that did nothave counter-terrorism legislation in place. Supranational legislation hasthereby mainly led to what in policy convergence theory is called bconvergence– it has mainly influenced the laggard countries to catch up withthe forerunner states. Thereby the similarity of the states has been growing.However, as some states, most notably France and the UK, went further thanthe supranational provisions required, whereas the other states compliedminimally with those provisions, convergence seems limited to a few areas ofcounter-terrorism legislation.
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..
