The greater vy for the swing technique (2.73 ± 0.19
m·s-1) compared to that of the traditional technique (2.51
± 0.21 m·s-1, p < 0.01) also led to a greater H (0.38 ± 0.05
m) for the swing technique when compared to traditional
blocking (0.32 ± 0.05 m, p < 0.01).