I always approached the problems kn

I always approached the problems knowing that it was possible to solve them and simply tried to connect the dots. I found that writing out all the information I was given—then used it to find all the new information I could find using equations (or if I could see far enough ahead, only what I knew I'd need). Now instead of looking directly for equations (which I do still do sometimes) I'll usually try and identify concepts at different parts and qualitatively analyze it before jumping into the math. Once I've figured it out conceptually (usually w/a diagram/picture/etc) I'll see which equations might help and then I just do the math.
I approach physics problems by trying to dissect them. I try to be very methodical and organized. After reading the problem, I list the given information, what I'm solving for and any known relationships or equations. I approach physics problems in a very qualitative respect. After reading a problem statement and identify what is to be solved for, I put down on paper the relative concepts for the problem. Usually diagrams with necessary parts labeled. Being able to draw such a “complete” diagram insures I have knowledge of the necessary information to solve the problem.
When I am trying to answer a physics question I first like to understand what the question is asking. Once I understand the question I try to find any equations that are helpful in solving the question. I have begun to at least mentally, and sometimes physically map out the problem. This is a new thing, and I have found that it really helps me to keep terms and ideas straight as I work thought the problem.
TABLE III.
Examples of comments from the same student at the beginning and end of the semester. These comments showed resiliency to maintaining a limiting strategy
Precourse reflection Postcourse reflection
Most of the time I look for equations to solve the question with the information that is given. If that does not work then I try to combined equations to make the correct variables.
The best way I solve a problem is to first look at an example and work thought it then try to apply the techniques used in solving it to solve the real problem. The first thing I do when attacking a physics problem is organize all of the information I am given and determine what I am looking for. Then I find relevant equations for the situation. Once I have all of that information, its usually just algebra or calc to get to the answer.
I start by looking at what variables are given. Then, I figure out what term the problem is asking me to solve for. I usually then look over the equation sheet and see if any of the equations look like they could be of use in the problem. I first look to see what I need to find in the problem. Next, I look at what variables are given in the problem. Then I look at my lecture notes for an equation that could be used. If I cannot find a useful equation, then I search the book for problems or examples.
Not submitted Despite your warning against it, I still go equation-hunting. Equations are basically models of concepts, and so it's the equivalent of looking for the right concept. However, most of all, it works.