ConclusionsThe results presented show that the most useful method ofplant fatty acid GC analysis is the one based on the derivatizationusing (trimethylsilyl)diazomethane. It was much more precise thanstandard BF3/MeOH reaction, in the same time producing loweramount of interferences in the range of retention times charac-teristic for common plant FAs. However, some overestimation ofFA(18:0) content cannot be excluded when TMSD is used. Methodsbased on the synthesis of trimethylsilyl or tert-butyldimethylsilylderivatives were more difficult to apply because of the transes-terification products appearing on the chromatograms. After theoptimization of the hydrolysis procedure, quite precise and repeat-able results were obtained. However, due to the poor separation ofFA(18:X) compounds and the large amount of interferences, thereliable analysis using silylation was impossible. It can be an inter-esting alternative for the GC–MS analyses, as long as full separationof the compounds is not required. Additional experiments concern-ing the development of procedures for the analysis of silylated plantFAs are, however, still needed.