I want us to discuss based on facts

I want us to discuss based on facts that are unarguable
1. Thai government led by Yingluck intended to pass the Amnesty law which will cancel all the verdicts of Thai court to imprison Thaksin on the cause of killing 85 protesters in the Southern part of Thailand and Thai government has to return the corruption money to Thanksin value THB 46 billion (USD 1.5 billion). If not for the protesters, this law would have passed. This is not an assumption because if they do not intend for it to pass why would they push this law at the first place
2. Thai government led by Yingluck intents to rewrite our constitution to suit their needs by allowing senate to apply for the member of the house of representatives and allowing that the members of the house of representative can be a relative to the senate these changes compensate the ability of check and balance between two houses. Luckily the constitution court had ruled that the government has broken the constitution law when they are trying to pass this law and hence this law is void. But the government has announced that they will not accept the court ruling!
3. Thai government led by Yingluck has passed the law on the development of the high-speed train project worth THB 2,200,000 million (USD 66,000 Million) which allow the government to spend the amount without having to as the approval on project details through the house of representative and the project doesn't need to go