This research has studied different

This research has studied different methods for measuring use of print serials in
academic libraries. Researching how other libraries conduct use studies is very valuable
for any library that wants to conduct its own use study. Knowledge of what has “gone
before” will inform the use-study process, and will suggest to librarians the most
effective methods for measuring use in their own libraries.

Examining these ten use studies has shown the different methods libraries use to
measure use of their serials collections, as well as the different approaches libraries have
for each method. Counting re-shelvings of print serials was the most popular way of
measuring use, although libraries approached these studies in many different ways.
Studies using a combination of methods to collect journal use had more information
about which journals were used in the library and how they were used. Combining
different methods is a way to ensure the information from the study is accurate and
complete

Current problems with serials, including budgetary and space constraints, have
forced libraries to examine their collections in order to make decisions about canceling
subscriptions, moving items, or discarding volumes of serials. Libraries must be
informed about how their collection is used and what materials their patrons use most.
Conducting a use study is the only way to get reliable information on what materials are
being used in the library and which ones can be discarded. Serials prices will
undoubtedly continue to rise faster than library budgets and library shelves will not be
able to accommodate growing serials forever. Therefore, librarians must be aware of
ways to measure use of these materials, so when the time comes to remove items from
the shelves, the library’s collection can still support the needs of its patrons.