Abstract
Purpose– The purpose was to find if the relationship between personality and
transformational leadership exists, when the appraisals are from leaders themselves and from their
subordinates.
Design/methodology/approach– The approach taken was quantitative analyses of 439 leaders
and 380 subordinates.
Findings– Results indicated that the relationship between personality and transformational
leadership exists. Subordinates’ and leaders’ ratings did not converge. According to leaders’
self-ratings, the extraverted, intuitive and perceiving preferences favour transformational leadership.
On the contrary, subordinates’ ratings indicated that leaders with sensing preference are associated
with transformational leadership.
Research limitations/implications– Even if sample size is relatively extensive, it represents
mainly middle-level leaders. More data would be needed to gain the overall picture of this topic in all
leadership levels.
Practical implications– Results of this study can be used in training and development, when
trying to enhance mutual understanding. Also when leaders are appraising themselves they can have
more realistic picture when knowing their tendencies due to the personality.
Originality/value– The results provides further information of this field, where the earlier results
have been somehow contradictory. Paper shows how different personalities tend to over- or
underestimate themselves when comparing to subordinates ratings.
KeywordsPerformance appraisal, Personality, Transformational leadership
Paper typeResearch paper