pp. 153–82. 3 Significant attention

pp. 153–82. 3 Significant attention has been paid to these debates in the Argentine historical literature. See especially Eduardo Zimmermann, Los liberales reformistas: La cuestio ´n social en la Argentina, 1890–1916. (Buenos Aires, 1995) and Juan Suriano (ed.), La cuestio ´n social en la Argentina 1870–1943. (Buenos Aires, 2000). For the case of Chile, see James O. Morris, Elites, Intellectuals, and Consensus: A Study of the Social Question and the Industrial Relations System in Chile. (Ithaca, 1966). For an impressive account of how debates on the ‘social question’ and ‘social politics’ played themselves out in Europe and the United States, see Daniel T. Rodgers, Atlantic Crossings: Social Politics in a Progressive Age. (Cambridge MA and London, 1998). 4 Morris, Elites, Intellectuals, and Consensus, p. 78. Even this broad definition might be considered limited. Juan Suriano argues that, in Argentina, the term also referred to issues involving gender and ethnicity. See Juan Suriano, ‘Introduccio´n: Una aproximacio´n a la definicio´n de la cuestio ´n social en Argentina’, in Suriano (ed.), La cuestio ´n social, p. 2