Fig. 2. Comparison of inhibition indicesobtained by the rapid method (A) and the usual method (B) Each index was calculated as the mean of four different determinations during the fIrst 2 h
Fig. 2. Comparison of inhibition indicesobtained by the rapidmethod (A) and the usual method (B)Each index was calculated as the mean of four different determinations duringthe fIrst 2 h